dos Observatioletter off Blame Permeability Improvement Throughout Fluid Injection Tests

Within this investigation, we focus on injection-triggered “aseismic” slip and, specifically, how the improvement out-of blame permeability affects the development out-of sneak. To help you unravel possible regulation on the aseismic sneak, i earliest revisit the fresh evolution out of blame permeability from the aseismic deformations observed through the a call at situ try out away from liquid injections into a densely instrumented blame from inside the a good carbonate development (Guglielmi, Cappa, et al., 2015 ). 2nd, i run paired hydromechanical simulations away from fluid injections in a single planar blame not as much as worry and water tension criteria similar to men and women based in the when you look at the situ try out. I concentrate on the aftereffect of the change into the fault permeability for different initially fret criteria and you will friction statutes so you can elucidate how this may affect the development of aseismic slip.

where ?f is the viscosity of fluid (Pa.s) and w is the fault width (m). In a parametric analysis, we find values of hydraulic aperture that minimize the misfit between model predictions and observed pressure and flow rate histories at the injection point. The permeability is then defined from the best fit value of hydraulic aperture. Thus, this experiment offers ideal conditions to evaluate how fault permeability evolves with accumulated displacements, both during aseismic deformation and seismic activity, and to constrain further hydromechanical modeling analyses of fault slip (see section 4).

3 Hydromechanical Acting away from Fault Sneak because of the Liquid Treatment

Findings shown an intricate interplay anywhere between liquid stress, fault distortion, and blame permeability change. Guglielmi, Cappa, mais aussi al. ( 2015 ) showed that the increase in water tension induces blame starting and aseismic sneak at the treatment. New seismicity is then triggered ultimately at a distance regarding shot because of the be concerned import of this propagating aseismic sneak biker planet. Duboeuf mais aussi al. ( 2017 ) confirmed this procedure within the a series of eleven shot experiments during the an identical web site. On these tests, seismic occurrences was indeed discover between 1 and you may a dozen yards regarding injections circumstances in which the measured fault sneak are aseismic. Upcoming, Guglielmi, Cappa, ainsi que al. ( 2015 ) located a 14-bend boost of the fault permeability out-of 0.07 to a single.0 ? 10 ?ten meters dos throughout aseismic slip, symbolizing from the 70% of one’s total cumulative permeability improve (20-fold) in injection several months (Figure step 1). In contrast, during a consequent chronilogical age of seismic pastime far away regarding shot, the latest blame permeability only develops from 1.0 ? 10 ?10 to just one.thirty-five ? ten ?10 m 2 . Hence, these intricate findings regarding fault permeability improvement during the blame activation highlight your progression out of fault hydraulic details is essential to learn the growth regarding sneak while in the fluid shot. Obviously, the rise during the liquid pressure triggers fault beginning and sneak you to definitely produce permeability transform. Upcoming, various settings regarding blame permeability alter appear to dictate brand new slip behavior.

3.1 Model Settings

The method has been used to check the fresh new hydromechanical decisions of fractured stones and you will fault areas throughout the liquid pressurization (Cappa ainsi que al., 2006 ; Guglielmi et al., 2008 ), appearing your evolution from fault hydraulic diffusivity was a totally coupled condition based on worry and you will liquid tension (Guglielmi, Elsworth, ainsi que al., 2015 ).

We select a simplified yet representative 2-D model (200 m ? 50 m) that considers fluid injection into a horizontal flat fault in a homogeneous elastic and impervious medium (Figure 2a). The remote normal (?n) and shear stress (?) resolved on the fault plane are constant. During injection, the fluid pressure in the fault is increased step by step in 0.5-MPa increments every 150 s. Injection occurs in a point source (Figure 2a) in order to reproduce a loading path consistent with the in situ data presented in Figure 1. The total time of injection is 1,050 s. We focus on the period of largest increase of fault permeability observed in the in situ experiment (Figure 1b). For numerical accuracy, the mesh size is refined along the fault (0.15 m) and gradually increases to 0.5 m in the direction normal to the fault toward model boundaries.

Pin It on Pinterest

Votre panier0
Il n'y a pas d'articles dans le panier !
Continuer les achats